Functional Activities Questionnaire, Czech Version – a Validation Study
Authors: O. Bezdíček, J. Lukavský,
Authors - sphere of activity: 1Centrum klinických neurověd, Neurologická klinika 1. LF UK a VFN v Praze 2Psychologický ústav AV ČR, Praha 3Psychiatrické centrum Praha
Article: Cesk Slov Neurol N 2011; 74/107(1): 36-42
Category: Original Paper
Number of articles displayed: 720x
This article describes the psychometric properties of Pfeffer’s Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ), in its Czech version, for measurement of the activities of daily living (ADL) in older persons without cognitive impairment.
Pfeffer’s Functional Activities Questionnaire and the neuropsychological battery were administered to 136 older persons (test) at baseline (self-report). Eighty-two of these older persons were followed at 6-month intervals (retest) and they were also evaluated by their caregivers (informant report).
Neither age (self-report: r = 0.06; p = 0.50; informant report: r = 0.07; p = 0.57) nor education (self-report: r = 0.12; p = 0.18; informant report: r = –0.09; p = 0.49) had a significant influence on the FAQ results. Gender was statistically significant (self-report): t(35.33) = 2.848; p <0.01; informant report: t(18.13) = 2.332; p <0.05. The relation of FAQ to performance in the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) was not significant. There is a statistically significant relation between FAQ and the neuropsychological battery (particularly auditory verbal learning test (AVLT) and shopping list, but with low correlations). Between FAQ test and retest after a 6-month interval, a statistically significant difference (t(81) = –1.356; p = 0.18) emerged. The difference between self report and informant report was also statistically significant (t(63) = 3.274; p <0.01). Test-retest reliability of the FAQ scale between the first measurement and 6-month retest was r = 0.56, p <0.001. Correlation between self-report and informant report was r = 0.64, p <0.001. Internal consistency in test-retest and informant report was 0.62; 0.79; 0.46 (based on Cronbach’s α).
These findings indicate that FAQ is a valid and reliable instrument for the measurement of ADL in older persons without cognitive impairment. It is appropriate for the evaluation of functional deficit in older persons at possible risk of developing neurodegenerative disease.
questionnaire – validity – activities of daily living – Alzheimer‘s disease
The full wording of this article is available only to registered users. Plese register and you can read this article immediately.
If you are a subscriber, log in and enter the subscriber code from your magazine cover.
If you are not a subscriber, log in for unlimited access to older editions.
Tento článek si můžete přečíst pokud si aktivujete Premium účet.
SubscriptionSubscribe the Journal
The subscription grants you full access to all the articles.
Issue No.: 3 / 2013
- Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease | views: 125
- Spinocerebellar Ataxia 7 – a Case Report | views: 58
- Electrophysiological Examination of the Pelvic Floor | views: 48
- Ultrasound-guided Brain Cavernoma Surgery | views: 43
- Differences in the Modulation of Cortical Activity in Patients Suffering from Upper Arm Spasticity Following Stroke and Treated with Botulinum Toxin A | views: 34
- Torticollis at Grisel’s Syndrome – Case Reports | views: 30
- Significance and Limitations of Visual Evoked Potentials in the Study of Pathophysiology of Migraine | views: 24
- Evaluation of Epidemiological Stroke Data from the IKTA Register. Stroke Incidence in the Zlin District | views: 24
- X-adrenoleukodystrophy | views: 24
- The Role of a Neurootologist in Identification of Post-radiation Complications in Patients with Vestibular Schwannoma Treated with Leksell Gamma Knife | views: 19