Complex treatment of diffuse low-grade glioma – surgery technique and oncological treatment of residual tumors

Authors: R. Bartoš 1,2;  M. Sameš 1;  A. Malucelli 1;  A. Hejčl 1;  D. Ospalík 3;  F. Třebický 4;  V. Němcová 2
Authors‘ workplace: Neurochirurgická klinika Univerzity J. E. Purkyně, Masarykova nemocnice v Ústí nad Labem 1;  Anatomický ústav, 1. LF UK, Praha 2;  Neurologické oddělení, Masarykova nemocnice v Ústí nad Labem 3;  Ústav radiační onkologie, Nemocnice Na Bulovce, Praha 4
Published in: Cesk Slov Neurol N 2021; 84/117(1): 72-78
Category: Original Paper
doi: 10.48095/cccsnn202172


Aim: The aim of our work was retrospective evaluation of the resection extent of predicted and ongoing low-grade glioma (LGG) surgeries. Furthermore, we evaluated the behavior of defined residual tumors after subsequent oncological treatment in case of partial and subtotal resections.

Patients and methods: We evaluated a series of our 37 patients operated on during 2010–2019 at the Department of Neurosurgery, Masaryk Hospital in Ústí nad Labem. The anatomical eloquent boundary lines were strictly defined by the primary motor and visual cortex (g. precentralis and adjacent gyri to the calcarine sulcus), including their tracts, further pars triangularus and pars opercularis of the inferior frontal gyrus as expressive language areas and the structures of the central core. No absolute eloquent region was the perisylvian cortex of the dominant hemisphere. A partial resection we defined as a presence of the tumor layer > 1 cm evaluated on T2 weighted MRI 2–4 months after surgery. Subtotal resection was defined identically as tumor layer less or equal to 1 cm.

Results: As potentially possible radically resectable (YES), we evaluated an overall 25 patients (68%) in our series with: 1) six patients (16%) with a safe limit to the eloquent area (YES Safe) – in this instance we reached radical resection in all cases; 2) 19 patients (51%) with the necessity of reaching the border to the specific area (YES Risk) – in this instance we reached radical/subtotal/partial resection in 7/6/6 patients. As necessarily partially resectable (NO), we evaluated 12 patients (32%) and in this instance, we really reached partial resections in all cases. The residual tumor positively reacted to the oncological treatment in 90% of the cases, the shortest period of observation was 13 months. Major complication of the surgery occurred in one case of a female patient (2.7%). The other complications (5.4%) were mild – one case of hemianopsia and one case of a supplementary motor area lesion.

Conclusion: The definition of anatomical boundaries of LGG and position of eloquent areas correspond with prediction of the extent of gained resection. However, alpha-omega of success is respecting brain arteries and veins in the surgical field. If a neurosurgeon approaches the margin of safety in an eloquent cortex and its tracts and leaves a small remnant of the tumor during the surgery, radiochemotherapy after surgery is indicated and is effective


diffuse low-grade glioma – surgery – radiotherapy – Anatomy


1. Polívka J Jr., Polívka J, Rohan V et al. Aktuální pohled na management nízkostupňových gliových nádorů centrálního nervového systému. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2016; 79/112 (5): 534–540.

2. Konečná D, Netuka D. Difuzní nízkostupňové gliomy. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2020; 83/116 (5): 467–490. doi: 10.14735/amcsnn2020467.

3. Bartoš R, Vachata P, Hejčl A et al. Vliv funkčního mapování na výsledky operací nízkostupňových gliomů WHO grade II. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2011; 74/107 (3): 292–298.

4. Yaşargil MG, Krisht AF, Tűre U et al. Microsurgery of insular gliomas: part II – opening of the sylvian fissure. Contempor Neurosurg 2017; 39 (14): 1–6. doi: 10.1097/000 29679-200206150-00001.

5. Yaşargil MG, Krisht AF, Tűre U et al. Microsurgery of insular gliomas: part IV – surgical treatement and outcome. Contempor Neurosurg 2017; 39 (18): 1–8. doi: 10.1097/01.CNE.0000527944.73058.a6.

6.Tűre U, Harupt MV, Kaya AH et al. The paramedian supracerebellar-transtentorial approach to the entire lenght of the mediobasal temporal region: an anatomical and clinical study. J Neurosurg 2012; 116 (4): 773–791. doi: 10.3171/2011.12.JNS11791.

7. Serra C, Türe U, Krayenbühl N et al. Topographic classification of the thalamus surfaces related to microneurosurgery: a white matter fiber microdissection study. World Neurosurg 2017; 97: 438–452. doi: 10.1016/ j.wneu.2016.09.101.

8. Duffau H, Khalil I, Gatignol P et al. Surgical removal of corpus callosum infiltrated by low-grade glioma: functional outcome and oncological considerations. J Neurosurg 2004; 100 (3): 431–437. 10.3171/jns.2004.100.3. 0431.

9. Morshed RA, Young JS, Han SJ et al. The transcortical equatorial approach for gliomas of the mesial temporal lobe: techniques and functional outcomes. J Neurosurg 2019; 130 (3): 822–830. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.JNS172055.

10. Mishra A, Shetty P, Singh V et al. Microsurgical subpial resections for diffuse gliomas – old wine in a new bottle. Acta Neurochirurgica 2020; 162 (12): 3031–3035. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04524-1.

11. Roux A, Dezamis E, Trancart B et al. How I do it: trans-cortical approach for insular diffuse glioma. Acta Neurochirurgica 2020; 162 (12): 3025–3030. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04553-w.

12. National Geographic. Edison and Tesla‘s cutthroat ‚Current War‘ ushered in the electric age. [online]. Available form URL: https: //

13. De Witt Hamer PC, Robles SG, Zwinderman AH et al. Impact of intraoperative stimulation brain mapping on glioma surgery outcome: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30 (20): 2559–2565. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.4818.

14. Przybylowski CJ, Baranoski JF, So VM et al. Surgical morbidity of transsylvian versus transcortical approaches to insular gliomas. J Neurosurg 2019; 5: 1–8. doi: 10.3171/2018.12.JNS183075.

15. Bartoš R, Němcová V, Radovnický T et al. Gliomy limbického a paralimbického systému, technika a výsledky resekcí. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2016; 79/112 (2): 131–147. doi: 10.14735/amcsnn2016131.

16. Ribas EC, Yağmurlu K, de Oliveira E et al. Microsurgical anatomy of the central core of the brain. J Neurosurg 2017; 129 (3): 752–769. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.JNS162897.

17. Ojemann G, Ojemann J, Lettich E et al. Cortical language localization in left, dominant hemisphere. An electrical stimulation mapping investigation in 117 patients. 1989. J Neurosurg 2008; 108 (2): 411–421. doi: 10.3171/JNS/2008/108/2/0411.

18. Bartoš R, Jech R, Vymazal J et al. Validity of primary motor area localization with fMRI versus electric cortical stimulation: a comparative study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2009; 151 (9): 1071–1080. doi: 10.1007/s00701-009-0368-4.

19. Zolal A, Hejčl A, Vachata P et al. The use of diffusion tensor images of the corticospinal tract in intrinsic brain tumor surgery: a comparison with direct subcortical stimulation. Neurosurgery 2012; 71 (2): 331–340. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31825b1c18.

20. Třebický F, Kubeš J, Bartoš R et al. Léčba nízko­stupňového gliomu supratentoriální oblasti mozku po neurochirurgické subtotální resekci s projevy objemového up-gradingu. Klin Onkol 2012; 25 (4): 294–298. doi: 10.14735/amko2012294.

21. Bell EH, Zhang P, Shaw EG et al. Comprehensive genomic analysis in NRG oncology/RTOG 9802: a phase III trial of radiation versus radiation plus procarbazine, lomustine (CCNU), and vincristine in high-risk low-grade glioma. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38 (29): 3407–3417. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02983.

22. Lakomý R, Kazda T, Poprach A et al. Postavení chemo­terapie v pooperační léčbě low-grade gliomů. Klin Onkol 2017; 30 (5): 343–348. doi: 10.14735/amko2017343.

Paediatric neurology Neurosurgery Neurology

Article was published in

Czech and Slovak Neurology and Neurosurgery

Issue 1

2021 Issue 1

Most read in this issue

This topic is also in:

Forgotten password

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.


Don‘t have an account?  Create new account