Dynamic Methods of Quantitative Sensory Testing


Authors: S. Kincová 1,2;  E. Vlčková 1,2;  I. Šrotová 1,2;  J. Raputová 1;  J. Bednařík 1,2
Authors‘ workplace: Neurologická klinika LF MU a FN Brno 1;  CEITEC – Středoevropský technologický institut, MU, Brno 2
Published in: Cesk Slov Neurol N 2016; 79/112(1): 68-76
Category: Original Paper

Overview

Background:
So called “dynamic quantitative sensory methods” (dQST) represent relatively new QST application which enables to objectify certain mechanisms of pain processing, e.g. central integration or descending control. Their dysfunction may contribute to the development of chronic painful conditions. dQST methods proved the potential to predict the development of chronic postoperative pain. Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) and temporal summation (TS) are the most commonly used dQST tests.

Patients and methods:
The CPM and TS testing was performed in a group of 77 healthy volunteers (47 women tested in the ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle, 30 men, age range 19–73) using thermal pain stimuli. Efficiency of CPM and TS mechanism including age and gender influence was evaluated.

Results:
Efficient CPM was found in 84% of healthy volunteers. In remaining 16%, the inefficiency was mainly due to low intensity of testing or modulatory stimuli. Based on the temperature used, efficient TS mechanism was found in 92% or 98% of healthy individuals. Women in the ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle showed significantly more efficient CPM comparing to men. No sex differences of TS testing were found. Age had no significant effect on the CPM or TS mechanism in our group of healthy voluteers.

Conclusions:
Our study has verified the applicability of CPM and TS algorithms used. Women in ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle show increased anti-nociceptive setting comparing to men. No significant effect of age on central modulation of pain perception has been found in pain-free healthy individuals.

Key words:
pain perception – nociceptive pain – neuropathic pain – temporal summation – conditioned pain modulation – pain measurement – sex factors – age factors

The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study.

The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE “uniform requirements” for biomedical papers.


Sources

1. Vlčková E, Šrotová I. Vyšetření senzitivity. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2014; 77/ 110: 402– 418.

2. Cruccu G, Som­mer C, Anand P, Attal N, Baron R, Garcia-Lar­rea L et al. EFNS guidelines on neuropathic pain as­ses­s­­-ment: revised 2009. Eur J Neurol 2010; 17(8): 1010– 1018. doi: 10.1111/ j.1468-1331.2010.02969.x.

3. Rolke R, Baron R, Maier C, Töl­le TR, Treede RD, Beyer A et al. Quantitative sensory test­ing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values. Pain 2006; 123(3): 231– 243.

4. Yarnitsky D, Crispel Y, Eisenberg E, Granovsky Y, Ben-Nun A, Sprecher E et al. Prediction of chronic post-oper­ative pain: pre-operative DNIC test­ing identifies patients at risk. Pain 2008; 138(1): 22– 28.

5. Yarnitsky D. Conditioned pain modulation (the dif­fuse noxious inhibitory control-like ef­fect): its relevance for acute and chronic pain states. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2010; 23(5): 611– 615. doi: 10.1097/ ACO.0b013e32833c348b.

6. Arendt-Nielsen L, Yarnitsky D. Experimental and clinical applications of quantitative sensory test­ing applied to skin, muscles and viscera. J Pain 2009; 10(6): 556– 572. doi: 10.1016/ j.jpain.2009.02.002.

7. Eisenberg E, Midbari A, Haddad M, Pud D. Predict­ing the analgesic ef­fect to oxycodone by ‚static‘ and ‚dynamic‘ quantitative sensory test­ing in healthy subjects. Pain 2010; 151(1): 104– 109. doi: 10.1016/ j.pain.2010.06.025.

8. Yarnitsky D. Conditioned pain modulation (the dif­fuse noxious inhibitory control-like ef­fect): its relevance for acute and chronic pain states. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2010; 23(5): 611– 615. doi: 10.1097/ ACO.0b013e32833c348b.

9. Tousignant-Laflam­me Y, Marchand S. Excitatory and inhibitory pain mechanisms dur­ing the menstrual cycle in healthy women. Pain 2009; 146(1– 2): 47– 55. doi: 10.1016/ j.pain.2009.06.018.

10. Granot M, Weis­sman-Fogel I, Crispel Y, Pud D, Granovsky Y, Sprecher E et al. Determinants of endogenous analgesia magnitude in a dif­fuse noxious inhibitory control (DNIC) paradigm: do condition­ing stimulus painfulnes­s, gender and personality variables matter? Pain 2008; 136(1– 2): 142– 149.

11. Yarnitsky D, Bouhas­sira D, Drewes AM, Fil­lingim RB, Granot M, Hans­son P et al. Recom­mendations on practice of conditioned pain modulation (CPM) testing. Eur J Pain 2015; 19(6): 805– 806. doi: 10.1002/ ejp.605.

12. Rezaii T, Hirschberg AL, Carlström K, Ernberg M. The influence of menstrual phases on pain modulation in healthy women. J Pain 2012; 13(7): 646– 655. doi: 10.1016/ j.jpain.2012.04.002.

13. Šrotová I, Vlčková E, Straková J, Kincová S, Adamová B, Dušek L et al. Validace české verze komplexního protokolu kvantitativního testování senzitivity. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2015; 78/ 111(4): 442– 452.

14. Popescu A, LeResche L, Truelove E, Drangsholt M. Gender dif­ferences in pain modulation by dif­fuse noxious inhibitory controls: a systematic review. Pain 2010; 150(2): 309– 318. doi: 10.1016/ j.pain.2010.05.013.

15. Van Wijk G, Veldhuijzen D. Perspective on dif­fuse noxious inhibitory controls as a model of endogenous pain modulation in clinical pain syndromes. Pain 2010; 11(5): 408– 419. doi: 10.1016/ j.jpain.2009.10.009.

16. Edwards R, Fil­lingim R, Ness T. Age-related dif­ferences in endogenous pain modulation: a comparison of dif­fuse noxious inhibitory controls in healthy older and younger adults. Pain 2003; 101(1– 2): 155– 165.

17. Edwards RR, Ness TJ, Weigent DA, Fil­lingim RB. Individual dif­ferences in dif­fuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC): as­sociation with clinical variables. Pain 2003; 106(3): 427– 437.

18. Ware JE jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30(6): 473– 483.

Labels
Paediatric neurology Neurosurgery Neurology
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account