Sub signum coma –  cur­rent view of chronic disorders of consciousnes­s

Authors: A. Škutchanová 1;  E. Kantorová 2;  E. Kurča 2
Authors‘ workplace: Klinika intenzívnej medicíny a anesteziológie JLF UK a UN Martin 1;  Neurologická klinika JLF UK a UN Martin 2
Published in: Cesk Slov Neurol N 2019; 82(1): 19-24
Category: Review Article
doi: 10.14735/amcsnn201919


Chronic disorders of consciousness are a modern phenomenon. Recognis­­ing first behavioural signs of contact with the patient‘s environment after coma plays a key role in the patient`s access to extended treatment and rehabilitation, as well as in establish­­ing an ef­fective contact with the environment; it is also considered to be an important prognostic sign. Cur­rent western terms in comparison with traditional definition of apal­lic syndrome or the term coma vigile are more descriptive and precise. In recent years, new methods of as­ses­sment, which enable more exact evaluation of brain disorders were established. However, most of them remain experimental and lack clinical availability, which favours clinical test­­ing us­­ing daily objects. Behavioural response as­ses­sment is the standard to compare results obtained with other methods of as­ses­sment. In our work, we present our view on our perception of a patient with a disorder of consciousness and an overview of cur­rent options in identify­­ing the underly­­ing organic substrate.

Key words:

chronic disorders of consciousness – state of minimal consciousness – vegetative state – wakefulness without answering – WS/UWS – MCS – apallic syndrome – coma vigile – diagnostics – behavioural correlate – examination methods

The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study.

The Editorial Board declares that the manu­script met the ICMJE “uniform requirements” for biomedical papers.


1. Tononi G, Koch C. The neual corelates of consciousnes. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008; 1124: 239– 261. doi: 10.1196/ an­nals.1440.004.
2. Saras­so S, Boly M. Consciousness and complexity dur­­ing unresponsiveness induced by propofol, xenon, and ketamine. Curr Biol 2015; 25(23): 3099– 3105.
3. Ambler Z. Základy neurologie. Praha: Galén 2011.
4. Schiff ND, Nauvel T, Victor J. Large-scale brain dynamics in disorders of consciousnes­s. Curr Opin Neurobio­l 2014; 25: 7– 14. doi: 10.1016/ j.conb.2013.10.007.
5. Fischgold H, Mathis P, Fischgold H. Obnubilations, comas et stupeurs. Supplement 11. Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Paris: Mas­son et Cie 1959.
6. Jen­net B, Plum F. Persistent vegetative state after brain damage. A syndrome in search for a name. Lancet 1972; 1(7753): 734– 737.
7. Kretschmer E. Das apal­lische syndrom. Z ges. Neurol Psychiat 1940; 169: 576-579.
8. Laureys S, Per­rin F, Schankers et al. Residual cognitive function in comatose, vegetative and minimal­ly con­scious states. Curr Opin Neurol 2005; 18(6): 726– 733.
9. Multi-society task on PVS. Medical aspect of the persistent vegetative state (1). N Eng J Med 1994; 330(21): 1499– 1508. doi: 10.1056/ NEJM199405263302107.
10. Giacino J, Ashwal S, Childs N et al. The minimal­ly conscious state: definition and dia­gnostic criteria. Neurology 2002; 58(3): 349– 353.
11. Laureys S, Celesia GG, Cohadon F et al. Unresponsive wakeful­lness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apal­lic syndrome. BMC Med 2010; 8: 68. doi: 10.1186/ 1741-7015-8-68.
12. Gos­series O. Disorders of consciousnes­s: coma, veg­etative and minimal­ly conscious states. In: Cvetkovic D, Cosic I (eds). States of consciousnes­s. The Frontiers Col­lection, Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg 2011: 29– 55.
13. Lippert-Grüner M, Angerová Y, Hralová M et al. Pa­cient ve vegetativním stavu a jeho rehabilitace. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2011; 74/ 107(3): 279– 284.
14. Fins JJ, Schiff ND, Foley KM. Late recovery from the minimal­ly conscious state: ethical and policy implications. Neurology 2007; 68(4): 304– 307. doi: 10.1212/ 01.wnl.0000252376.43779.96.
15. Estraneo A, Moretta P, Cardinale V et al. A multicentre study of intentional behavioural responses mea­sured us­­ing the Coma Recovery Scale –  Revised in patients with minimal­ly conscious state. Clin Rehabil 2015; 29(8): 803– 808. doi: 10.1177/ 0269215514556002.
16. Cruse D, Fattizzo M, Owen AM et al. Why use a mir­ror to as­sess visual pursuit in prolonged disorders of consciousnes­s? Evidence from healthy control participants. BMC Neurol 2017; 17(1): 14. doi: 10.1186/ s12883-017-0798-1.
17. Giacino J, Kalmar K. Coma Recovery State –  revised, administration and scor­­ing design. [online]. Dostupné z URL: http:/ / combi/ crs/ CRS%20Syl­labus.pdf .
18. Leon-Car­rion J, Van Eeckhout P, Dominguez-Morales MDR. Review of subject: the locked-in syndrome: a syndrome look­­ing for a ther­apy. Brain Inj 2002; 16: 555– 569. 
19. Gerstenbrand F. Das traumatische Apal­lische Syndrom. Wien, New York: Springer 1967.
20. Vanhaudenhuyse A, Noirhom­me Q, TshibandaLJ et al. Default network con­nectivity reflects the le­vel of consciousness in non-com­municative brain-damaged patients. Brain 2010; 133(Pt 1): 161– 171. doi: 10.1093/ brain/ awp313.
21. Kirsch M, Guldenmund P, Ali Bahri M et al. Sedation of patients with disorders of consciousness dur­­ing neuroimaging: ef­fects on rest­­ing state functional brain con­nectivity. Anesth Analg 2017; 124(2): 588– 598. doi: 10.1213/ ANE.0000000000001721.
22. Kampfl A, Schmutzhard E, Franz G et al. Prediction of recovery from post-traumatic vegetative state with cerebral magnetic-resonance imaging. Lancet 1998; 351(9118): 1763– 1767. doi: 10.1016/ S0140-6736(97)10301-4.
23. Boly M, Gar­rido MI, Gos­series O et al. Preserved feedforward but impaired top-down proces­ses in the vege­tative state. Science 2011; 332(6031): 858– 862. doi: 10.1126/ science.1202043.
24. DiPer­ri C, Bahri MA, Amico E et al. Neural cor­relates of consciousness in patients who have emerged from a minimal­ly conscious state: a cros­s-sectional multimodal imag­­ing study. Lancet Neurol 2016: 15(8): 830– 842. doi: 10.1016/ S1474-4422(16)00111-3.
25. Thibaut A, Bruno MA, Chatel­le C et al. Metabolic activi­­ty in external and internal awareness networks in severely brain-damaged patients. J Rehabil Med 2012; 44(6): 487– 494. doi: 10.2340/ 16501977-0940.
26. Casali AG, Gos­series O, Rosanova M et al. A theoret­ical­ly based index of consciousness independent of sensory proces­s­­ing and behavior. Sci Transl Med 2013; 5(198): 198ra105. doi: 10.1126/ scitranslmed.3006294.
27. Di Per­ri C, Bastianel­lo S, Bartsch AJ et al. Limbic hypercon­nectivity in the vegetative state. Neurology 2013; 81(16): 1417– 1424. doi: 10.1212/ WNL.0b013e 3182a43b78.
28. Aruab J, Bachmann T, Singer W et al. Distil­l­­ing the neural cor­relates of consciousnes­s. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2012; 36(2): 737– 746. doi: 10.1016/ j.neubio­rev.2011.12.003.
29. Boly M, Faymonvil­le ME, Schnakers C et al. Perception of pain in the minimal­ly conscious state with PET acti­vation: an observational study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(11): 1013– 1020. doi: 10.1016/ S1474-4422(08)70219-9.
30. Di HB, Yu SM, Weng XC et al. Cerebral response to patient’s own name in the vegetative and minimal­ly conscious states. Neurology 2007; 68(12): 895– 899. doi: 10.1212/ 01.wnl.0000258544.79024.d0.
31. Doušek F. Hejno bez ptáků. Toito 2012.

Paediatric neurology Neurosurgery Neurology

Article was published in

Czech and Slovak Neurology and Neurosurgery

Issue 1

2019 Issue 1

Most read in this issue
Forgotten password

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.


Don‘t have an account?  Create new account