#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Utilization of motion analysis to quantify gait pathologies in spine surgery


Authors: J. Lodin 1,2;  M. Jelínek 3;  M. Sameš 1;  P. Vachata 1,2
Authors place of work: Neurochirurgická klinika Univerzity J. E. Purkyně, Masarykova nemocnice Krajské Zdravotní a. s., Ústí nad Labem 1;  Lékařská fakulta v Plzni, Karlova Univerzita, Plzeň 2;  Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně, Ústí nad Labem 3
Published in the journal: Cesk Slov Neurol N 2026; 89(2): 93-101
Category: Přehledný referát
doi: https://doi.org/10.48095/cccsnn202693

Summary

Instrumented motion analysis is a method more and more often encountered in world literature with regards to objective gait analysis. Although it is a very modern and potentially beneficial method, it is burdened by its complexity, which results in its misunderstanding and infrequent use. Furthermore, there is a paucity of literature reviewing its individual components and summarizing gait characteristics in specific pathologies of the musculoskeletal system. Spine pathologies are amongst the most common diagnoses affecting physiological gait, making them a common target for motion analysis. Although in some cases we can recognize specific motion patterns of individual spine diagnoses at first glance, alteration of specific components of the gait cycle can only be determined via instrumented gait analysis. The following review aims to familiarize clinicians with this method, as they encounter patients presenting with spine pathologies on a daily basis. The first section introduces the basic of gait physiology including the gait cycle and its components. The second section describes the individual components of instrumented motion analysis and the tools it uses. Finally, it concludes by describing motion patterns of the most common spine pathologies, which are based on patient analysis in the authors` own laboratory complemented by a review of world literature.

Keywords:

Spine – gait – degeneration – motion analysis – gait cycle – instrumented measurement


Zdroje

1. Mirelman A, Shema S, Maidan I et al. Gait. Handb Clin Neurol 2018; 159 : 119–134. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63916-5.00007-0.

2. Hecht GG, Van Rysselberghe NL, Young JL et al. Gait analysis in orthopaedic surgery: history, limitations, and future directions. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022; 30 (21): e1366–e1373. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00785.

3. Vaughan CL, Davis BL, O‘Connor JC. Dynamics of human gait. Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishers 1992.

4. Teulier C, Lee DK, Ulrich BD. Early gait development in human infants: plasticity and clinical applications. Dev Psychobiol 2015; 57 (4): 447–458. doi: 10.1002/dev.21291.

5. WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO motor development study: windows of achievement for six gross motor development milestones. Acta Paediatr Suppl 2006; 450 : 86–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.tb02379.x.

6. Peters DM, Fritz SL, Krotish DE. Assessing the reliability and validity of a shorter walk test compared with the 10-Meter Walk Test for measurements of gait speed in healthy, older adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2013; 36 (1): 24–30. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0b013e318248e20d.

7. Cheng DK, Nelson M, Brooks D et al. Validation of stroke-specific protocols for the 10-meter walk test and 6-minute walk test conducted using 15-meter and 30-meter walkways. Top Stroke Rehabil 2020; 27 (4): 251–261. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2019.1691815.

8. Celik Y, Stuart S, Woo WL et al. Gait analysis in neurological populations: progression in the use of wearables. Med Eng Phys 2021; 87 : 9–29. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2020.11.005.

9. Cicirelli G, Impedovo D, Dentamaro V et al. Human gait analysis in neurodegenerative diseases: a review. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2022; 26 (1): 229–242. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2021.3092875.

10. Schutte LM, Narayanan U, Stout JL et al. An index for quantifying deviations from normal gait. Gait Posture 2000; 11 (1): 25–31. doi: 10.1016/s0966-6362 (99) 00047-8.

11. Schwartz MH, Rozumalski A. The gait deviation index: a new comprehensive index of gait pathology. Gait Posture 2008; 28 (3): 351–357. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.05.001.

12. Baker R, McGinley JL, Schwartz MH et al. The gait profile score and movement analysis profile. Gait Posture 2009; 30 (3): 265–269. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.05.020.

13. Ropars J, Lemeur M, Vuillerot C et al. Changes in muscle activation during gait of children with duchenne muscular dystrophy. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2015; (Suppl 1): 2042–2043. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2015.1069615.

14. Dubousset J. Reflections of an orthopaedic surgeon on patient care and research into the condition of scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2011; 31 (Suppl 1): S1–S8. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181f73beb.

15. Zhou J, Ning X, Fathallah F. Differences in lumbopelvic rhythm between trunk flexion and extension. Clin Biomech (Bristol) 2016; 32 : 274–279. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.10.012.

16. Forsth P, Olafsson G, Carlsson T et al. A randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 2016; 374 (15): 1413–1423. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513721.

17. Ammendolia C, Stuber K, Tomkins-Lane C et al. What interventions improve walking ability in neurogenic claudication with lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review. Eur Spine J 2014; 23 (6): 1282–1301. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3262-6.

18. Tomkins-Lane CC, Battie MC, Hu R et al. Pathoanatomical characteristics of clinical lumbar spinal stenosis. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2014; 27 (2): 223–229. doi: 10.3233/BMR-130440.

19. Sun J, Liu YC, Yan SH et al. Clinical gait evaluation of patients with lumbar spine stenosis. Orthop Surg 2018; 10 (1): 32–39. doi: 10.1111/os.12367.

20. Fujita N, Sakurai A, Miyamoto A et al. Stride length of elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: multi-center study using the Two-Step test. J Orthop Sci 2019; 24 (5): 787–792. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.01.006.

21. Lodin J, Jelinek M, Sames M et al. Quantitative gait analysis of patients with severe symptomatic spinal stenosis utilizing the gait profile score: an observational clinical study. Sensors (Basel) 2022; 22 (4): 1633. doi: 10.3390/s22041633.

22. Kim JJ, Cho H, Park Y et al. Biomechanical influences of gait patterns on knee joint: kinematic & EMG analysis. PLoS One 2020; 15 (5): e0233593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233593.

23. Suda Y, Saitou M, Shibasaki K et al. Gait analysis of patients with neurogenic intermittent claudication. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002; 27 (22): 2509–2513. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200211150-00016.

24. Loske S, Nuesch C, Byrnes KS et al. Decompression surgery improves gait quality in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J 2018; 18 (12): 2195–2204. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.04.016.

25. Conrad BP, Shokat MS, Abbasi AZ et al. Associations of self-report measures with gait, range of motion and proprioception in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Gait Posture 2013; 38 (4): 987–992. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.05.010.

26. Bumann H, Nuesch C, Loske S et al. Severity of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis affects pelvic rigidity during walking. Spine J 2020; 20 (1): 112–120. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.08.016.

27. Yokogawa N, Toribatake Y, Murakami H et al. Differences in gait characteristics of patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis (L4 radiculopathy) and those with osteoarthritis of the hip. PLoS One 2015; 10 (4): e0124745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124745.

28. Wei W, Xu C, Yang XJ et al. Analysis of dynamic plantar pressure before and after the occurrence of neurogenic intermittent claudication in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: an observational study. Biomed Res Int 2020; 2020 : 5043583. doi: 10.1155/2020/5043583.

29. Urbanschitz L, Nuesch C, Scharen S et al. Walking stress-induced changes in gait patterns and muscle activity: patients with lumbar spinal stenosis versus asymptomatic controls. Gait Posture 2024; 114 : 55–61. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.08.083.

30. Nuesch C, Mandelli F, Przybilla P et al. Kinematics and paraspinal muscle activation patterns during walking differ between patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and controls. Gait Posture 2023; 99 : 44–50. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.10.017.

31. Fehlings MG, Tetreault LA, Wilson JR et al. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: current state of the art and future directions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013; 38 (Suppl 1): S1–S8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7e9e0.

32. Kalsi-Ryan S, Karadimas SK, Fehlings MG. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the clinical phenomenon and the current pathobiology of an increasingly prevalent and devastating disorder. Neuroscientist 2013; 19 (4): 409–421. doi: 10.1177/1073858412467377.

33. Malone A, Meldrum D, Bolger C. Gait impairment in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: comparison with age -⁠ and gender-matched healthy controls. Eur Spine J 2012; 21 (12): 2456–2466. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2433-6.

34. Maezawa Y, Uchida K, Baba H. Gait analysis of spastic walking in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy. J Orthop Sci 2001; 6 (5): 378–384. doi: 10.1007/s007760170002.

35. Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Johnk K, Mader S et al. Analysis of gait in cervical myelopathy. Gait Posture 1999; 9 (3): 184–189. doi: 10.1016/s0966-6362 (99) 00015-6.

36. Yoon JY, Chang H, Park KB et al. Effect of the number of involved spinal cord segments on gait function in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Asian Spine J 2012; 6 (4): 233–240. doi: 10.4184/asj.2012.6.4.233.

37. Kitade I, Nakajima H, Takahashi A et al. Kinematic, kinetic, and musculoskeletal modeling analysis of gait in patients with cervical myelopathy using a severity classification. Spine J 2020; 20 (7): 1096–1105. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.01.014.

38. Haddas R, Cox J, Belanger T et al. Characterizing gait abnormalities in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a neuromuscular analysis. Spine J 2019; 19 (11): 1803–1808. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.06.005.

39. Malone A, Meldrum D, Gleeson J et al. Electromyographic characteristics of gait impairment in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 2013; 22 (11): 2538–2544. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2928-9.

40. Sembrano JN, Polly DW. How often is low back pain not coming from the back? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34 (1): E27–E32. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818b8882.

41. Busso C, Cambursano S, Aprato A et al. Algo-functional indexes and spatiotemporal parameters of gait after sacroiliac joint arthrodesis. J Clin Med 2020; 9 (9): 2860. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092860.

42. Hermans SMM, Paulussen EMB, Notermans RAJ et al. Motion analysis in patients with postpartum sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a cross-sectional case-control study. Clin Biomech (Bristol) 2022; 100 : 105773. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105773.

43. Mar D, Robinson K, Wilson B et al. Effect of sacroiliac fusion on gait, standing balance, and pelvic mobility for unilateral sacroiliac joint dysfunction. N Am Spine Soc J 2023; 16 : 100288. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100288.

44. Lodin J, Jelinek M, Prochazka J et al. Quantitative gait analysis of patients with severe sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a prospective clinical study. J Neurosurg Sci 2023; 67 (6): 694–701. doi: 10.23736/S0390-5616.21.05448-5.

45. Capobianco RA, Feeney DF, Jeffers JR et al. Patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction exhibit altered movement strategies when performing a sit-to-stand task. Spine J 2018; 18 (8): 1434–1440. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.03.008.

46. Feeney DF, Capobianco RA, Montgomery JR et al. Individuals with sacroiliac joint dysfunction display asymmetrical gait and a depressed synergy between muscles providing sacroiliac joint force closure when walking. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2018; 43 : 95–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2018.09.009.

47. Ben Chaabane N, Conze PH, Lempereur M et al. Quantitative gait analysis and prediction using artificial intelligence for patients with gait disorders. Sci Rep 2023; 13 (1): 23099. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49883-8.

Štítky
Dětská neurologie Neurochirurgie Neurologie
Přihlášení
Zapomenuté heslo

Zadejte e-mailovou adresu, se kterou jste vytvářel(a) účet, budou Vám na ni zaslány informace k nastavení nového hesla.

Přihlášení

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte se

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#