The Value of Repeated Non-confirmatory Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) for the Diagnosis of Narcolepsy

Authors: K. Šonka;  L. Pazderová;  J. Bušková;  M. Pretl;  S. Dostálová;  T. Vorlová;  J. Piško;  E. Maurovich-Horvat;  L. Plchová;  J. Volná;  I. Příhodová;  D. Suchá;  S. Nevšímalová;  D. Kemlink
Authors‘ workplace: Neurologická klinika a Centrum klinických neurověd, 1. LF UK a VFN v Praze
Published in: Cesk Slov Neurol N 2014; 77/110(4): 444-448
Category: Original Paper

Studie vznikla za podpory grantu IGA MZ ČR NT13238– 4/ 2012 a PRVOUK‑ P26/ LF1/ 4.


Narcolepsy is confirmed if the MSLT (Multiple Sleep Latency Test) shows the mean sleep latency of ≤8 min and ≥2 episodes of sleep with early onset of REM sleep. The aim was to assess the value of repeated MSLT in subjects with suspected narcolepsy after the first MSLT failed to confirm narcolepsy.

Patients and methods:
This is a retrospective study of the MSLT results in adult patients examined for narcolepsy at the Sleep and Wake Disorders Center of the Department of Neurology, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague during a 13-year period. The study analysed 39 adults with suspected narcolepsy who underwent second MSLT in a course of one year after their first MSLT results failed to meet the criteria for narcolepsy, and 42 patients whose initial MSLT was consistent with narcolepsy.

In 19 patients, the first MSLT was negative, while the second was positive. In 20 patients, both the first and repeated MSLT failed to meet the diagnostic criteria for narcolepsy. These groups differed from one another and from patients diagnosed with the first MSLT in REM sleep latency during nocturnal polysomnography. Sleep latency in the first test is predictive of the outcome of the repeated MSLT (p < 0.001). Sensitivity of one MSLT compared to two is 82.4%, and negative predictive value of the first non-confirmatory test is 48%.

It is useful to repeat testing in patients with suspected narcolepsy and inconclusive MSLT.

Key words:
narcolepsy – cataplexy – Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) – REM sleep – sensitivity – negative predictive value


1. American Academy of Sleep Medicine. International classification of sleep disorders, 2nd ed. Dia­gnostic and coding manual. Westchester (Il); American Academy of Sleep Medicine 2005.

2. Littner MR, Kushida C, Wise M, Davila DG, Morgenthaler T, Lee‑ Chiong T et al. Practice parameters for clinical use of the multiple sleep latency test and the maintenance of wakefulness test. Sleep 2005; 28(1): 113– 121.

3. Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep 1991; 14(6): 540– 545.

4. Arand D, Bonnet M, Hurwitz T, Mitler M, Rosa R, Sangal RB. The clinical use of the MSLT and MWT. Sleep 2005; 28(1): 123– 144.

5. Coelho FM, Georgsson H, Murray BJ. Benefit of repeat multiple sleep latency testing in confirming a possible narcolepsy dia­gnosis. J Clin Neurophysiol 2011; 28(4): 412– 414. doi: 10.1097/ WNP.0b013e 31822734a3.

6. Chervin RD, Aldrich MS, Pickett R, Guilleminault C. Comparison of the results of the Epworth sleepiness scale and the multiple sleep latency test. J Psychosom Res 1997; 42(2): 145– 155.

7. Hořínek D, Šonka K, Dostálová S, Pretl M, Faltýnová E. Epworth sleepiness scale in sleep apnoea syndrome patients. Neural Network World 2004; 14(1): 67– 72.

8. Aldrich MS, Chervin RD, Malow BA. Value of the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) for the dia­gnosis of narcolepsy. Sleep 1997; 20(8): 620– 629.

9. Roth B, Nevšímalová S, Šonka, K, Dočekal P. An alternative to the multiple sleep latency test for determining sleepiness in narcolepsy and hypersomnia: polygraphic score of sleepiness. Sleep 1986; 9(2): 243– 245.

10. Folkerts M, Rosenthal L, Roehrs T, Krstevska S, Murlidhar A, Zorick F et al. The reliability of the dia­gnostic features in patients with narcolepsy. Biol Psychiatry 1996; 40(3): 208– 214.

11. Dauvilliers Y, Gosselin A, Paquet J, Touchon J, Billiard M, Montplaisir J. Effect of age on MSLT results in patients with narcolepsy‑ cataplexy. Neurology 2004; 62(1): 46– 50.

Paediatric neurology Neurosurgery Neurology

Article was published in

Czech and Slovak Neurology and Neurosurgery

Issue 4

2014 Issue 4

Most read in this issue

This topic is also in:

Forgotten password

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.


Don‘t have an account?  Create new account