-
Home page
- Journal archive
- Current issue
Fetal Radiation Risk Due to X-ray Procedures Performed on Pregnant Women
Authors: L. Súkupová 1; P. Vachata 2
Authors‘ workplace: Úsek ředitele, Institut klinické a experimentální medicíny, Praha 1; Neurochirurgická klinika UJEP a Krajská zdravotní a. s. Masarykova nemocnice v Ústí nad Labem, o. z. 2
Published in: Cesk Slov Neurol N 2017; 80/113(3): 276-279
Category: Review Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.14735/amcsnn2017276Overview
The paper provides a review of information regarding fetal doses and subsequent detrimental effects from X-ray procedures performed on pregnant patients. Fetal doses from X-ray procedures performed outside the abdomen and pelvic area are negligible and there is no reason for concern. Fetal doses from radiography of the abdomen and/or pelvic area can be as high as several mSv and, therefore, still far away from a threshold for detrimental effects. Fetal doses from CT, fluoroscopy and interventional procedures in the abdomen and/or pelvic area can exceed the threshold of 100 mSv for detrimental effects. It is necessary to make an accurate estimate of the fetal dose based on exposure parameters and used projections. If the estimated fetal dose is higher than 500 mSv, some detrimental effects will appear. If the estimated fetal dose is in the range of 100–500 mSv, the phase of the pregnancy as well as other aspects (ethical, religious...) need to be considered before making any decision. An estimated fetal dose lower than 100 mSv does not represent any risk of detrimental effects for the fetus.
Key words:
fetal dose – X-ray procedure – detrimental effects – stochastic effects
The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study.
The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE “uniform requirements” for biomedical papers.
Labels
Paediatric neurology Neurosurgery Neurology
Article was published inCzech and Slovak Neurology and Neurosurgery
2017 Issue 3-
All articles in this issue
- Low Back Pain – Evidence-based Medicine and Current Clinical Practice. Is there Any Reason to Change Anything?
- Results of Endocrine Function after Transsphenoidal Surgery for Non-functional Pituitary Macroadenomas
- Radiological Findings in Term-neonates with Hypoxic-ischemic Encephalopathy
- Token Test – Validation Study in Older Czech Adults and Patients with Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Measurement of Malingering – Coin in the Hand Test
- Effects of Targeted Orofacial Rehabilitation in Patients after Stroke with Speech Disorders
- Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Patients with Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
- Anti-NMDAR Antibodies in Demyelinating Diseases
- Pyridoxine-dependent Epilepsy – Case Reports
- Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors – WHO 2016 Update
- Quality of Life in Self-sufficient Patients after Stroke
- Myotonic Dystrophy – Unity in Diversity
- Febrile Seizures – Sometimes Less is More
- Fetal Radiation Risk Due to X-ray Procedures Performed on Pregnant Women
- Successful Treatment of Meningoencephalitis due to Cryptococcus gattii with Ommaya Reservoir and Intrathecal Injection of Amphotericin B – a Case Report
- Differential Diagnosis of Bithalamic and Pallidal Hypointensity – a Case of HEXB Mutation
- Significant Brain Oedema in Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformation – a Case Report
- Czech and Slovak Neurology and Neurosurgery
- Journal archive
- Current issue
- About the journal
Most read in this issue- Myotonic Dystrophy – Unity in Diversity
- Fetal Radiation Risk Due to X-ray Procedures Performed on Pregnant Women
- Low Back Pain – Evidence-based Medicine and Current Clinical Practice. Is there Any Reason to Change Anything?
- Febrile Seizures – Sometimes Less is More
Login#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#Forgotten passwordEnter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.
- Journal archive