Low Back Pain – Evidence-based Medicine and Current Clinical Practice. Is there Any Reason to Change Anything?


Authors: E. Nováková ;  M. Říha
Authors‘ workplace: Oddělení rehabilitační a fyzikální medicíny, ÚVN – VFN Praha
Published in: Cesk Slov Neurol N 2017; 80/113(3): 0
Category: Review Article
doi: 10.14735/amcsnn2017280

Overview

The aim of this paper is to outline current options of LBP care, including a summary of an extensive personal clinical experience using the Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT, formerly known as the McKenzie method). Results from a so far only randomised controlled trial of LBP care in the Czech Republic are included. LBP is one of the most frequent causes of visits to a physician of any speciality. Current terminology generally corresponds to the present diagnostic approaches that are based on morphology. Consequently, therapy is non-specific. This paper provides an overview of current research evidence and LBP classification and sub-classification guidelines that suggest functional classification of vertebropathies to enable targeted therapy, for example MDT (an assessment of the symptomatic and mechanical presentation during loaded strategies, followed by treatment according to directional preference). Each syndrome is completed with a typical history and physical presentation. Just as a physician can differentiate flu from tonsillitis, a practitioner employing the MDT concept can utilize clear algorithms to differentiate between mechanical and other syndromes. The McKenzie MDT method is based on an assessment of a symptomatic presentation focussing on specific movements and positions. According to the responses, it is then possible to establish Directional Preference for each individual. The Directional Preference describes a clinical phenomenon where a specific direction of repeated movement and/or sustained position results in a clinically relevant improvement in either symptoms and/or mechanics. Centralisation describes a phenomenon, where distal pain originating from the spine is progressively abolished in the distal to proximal direction. It occurs in response to loading strategies (repeated movements or postures). It is usually a rapid and always a lasting change in pain location, ranging from minutes to days.

Key words:
low back pain – Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy – directional preference – centralisation – disc herniation – classification algorithm

The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study.

The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE “uniform requirements” for biomedical papers.


Sources

1. Deyo RA, Dworkin SF, Amtmann D, et al. Report of the NIH Task Force on Research Standards for Chronic Low Back Pain. Int J Ther Mas­sage Bodywork 2015;8(3):16– 33. doi: 10.2522/ ptj.2015.95.2.e1.

2. Mül­ler I, Kacerovský P. Doporučené postupy pro praktické lékaře: Bolesti zad vertebrogen­ního původu. Česká lékařská společnost Jana Evangelisty Purkyně 2001. [cit. 2016 Čer 28]. Dostupné z URL: http:/ / www.cls.cz/ seznam-doporucenych-postupu.

3. Cook Ch. Im­mediate ef­fects from manual ther­apy: much ado about nothing? J Man Manip Ther 2011;19(1):3– 4. doi: 10.1179/ 106698110X12804993427009.

4. Donelson R. Rapidly reversible low back pain. An evidence-based pathway to widespread recoveries and savings. Hanover: SeflCare First LLC 2007.

5. Rosen MR. Report of a CSAG Com­mittee on Back Pain. Clinical Standards Advisory Group: Back Pain. London HMSO 1994.

6. Spitzer WO. Magnitude of the problem. In: Scientific approach to the as­ses­sment and management of activity-related spinal disorders. A monograph for clinicians. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1987;12(Suppl 7):12– 5.

7. McKenzie R. The Lumbar Spine: Mechanical Dia­gnosis and Therapy. 1st ed. Vol. 1– 2. New Zealand: Spinal Publications 2003.

8. Surkitt LD, Ford JJ, Hahne AJ, et al. Ef­ficacy of directional preference management for low back pain: a systematic review. Physical Therapy 2012;92:652– 65. doi: 10.2522/ ptj.20100251.

9. Long A, Donelson R, Fung T. Does it matter which exercise? A randomized control trial of exercise for low back. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29(23):2593– 602.

10. Hef­ford C. McKenzie clas­sification of mechanical spinal pain: profile of syndromes and directions of preference. Manual Therapy 2008;13(1):75– 81.

11. Werneke M, May S. The centralization phenomenon and fear avoidance beliefs as prognostic factors for acute low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2005;35:844– 5.

12. Werneke M, Hart D, Cutrone G, et al. As­sociation Between Directional Preference and Centralization in Patients with Low Back Pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2011;41(1):22– 31.

13. May S, Aina A. Centralization and directional preference: a systematic review. Man Ther 2012;17(6):497– 506. doi: 10.1016/ j.math.2012.05.003.

14. Edmond S, Cutrone G, Werneke M, et al. As­sociation between centralization and directional preference and functional and pain outcomes in patients with neck pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2014;44(2):68– 75. doi: 10.2519/ jospt.2014.4632.

15. May S, Littlewood C, Bishop A. Reliability of procedures used in the physical examination of non-specific low back pain: a systematic review. Aust J Physiother 2006;52(2):91– 102.

16. Apeldoorn AT, Bos­selaar H, Ostelo RW, et al. Identification of patients with chronic low back pain who might benefit from additional psychological as­ses­s­­-ment. Clin J Pain 2012;28(1):23– 31. doi: 10.1097/ AJP.0b013e31822019d0.

17. Van Helvoirt H, Apeldoorn A, Ostelo R, et al. Transforaminal epidural steroid injections fol­lowed by mechanical dia­gnosis and therapy to prevent surgery for lumbar disc herniations. Pain Med 2014;15(7):1100– 8. doi: 10.1111/ pme.12450.

18. Razmjou H, Kramer JF, Yamada R. Inter-tester reliability of McKenzie evaluation in as­ses­sment patients with mechanical LBP. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2000;30(7):368– 89.

19. Kilpikoski S, Airaksinen O, Kankaanpaa M, et al. Interexaminer reliability in LBP as­ses­sment us­ing the McKenzie method. Spine 2002;27(8):E207– 14.

20. Kilpikoski S. Does centraliz­ing pain on the initial visit predict outcomes in adults with low back pain. A secondary analysis of a randomized control­led trial with 1-year fol­low-up. Manuel­le Therapie 2010;14:136– 41.

21. May S, Ross J. The McKenzie clas­sification system in the extremities: a reliability study us­ing McKenzie as­ses­sment forms and experienced clinicians. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2009;32(7):556– 63. doi: 10.1016/ j.jmpt.2009.08.007.

22. Clare HA, Adams R, Maher CG. Reliability of McKenzie clas­sification of patients with cervical or lumbar pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2005;28(2):122– 7.

23. Abady AH, Rosedale R, Overend TJ, et al. Inter-examiner reliability of diplomats in the mechanical dia­gnosis and therapy system in as­ses­s­ing patients with shoulder pain. J Man Manip Ther 2014;22(4):199– 205. doi: 10.1179/ 2042618614Y.0000000068.

24. Nováková E. Metoda McKenzie a její použití u pa­cientů s vertebrogen­ním syndromem bederním převážně se symp­tomy iritačně zánikovými. Rehabil Fyz Lék 2000;7:123– 9.

25. Novakova E, May S, Riha M, et al. Direction Spe-cific or Stabilisation Exercises for Chronic Low BackPain Patients. Random Study. MDT World Press 2012;1:1– 7.

26. Hicks GE, Fritz JM, Delitto A, et al. Preliminary development of a clinical prediction rule for determin­ing which patients with low back pain will respond to a stabilization exercise program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86(9):1753– 62.

27. Pengel M, Refshauge KM, Maher C. Responsiveness of pain disability and physical impairment outcomes in patients with low back pain. Spine 2004;29:879– 83.

28. Stratford P, Binkley J, Solomon P, et al. As­ses­s­ing change over time in patients with low back pain. Phys Ther 1994;74(6):528– 33.

29. Stratford P, Gill C, Westaway M, et al. As­ses­s­ing dis­ability and change on individual patients: a report of a patient specific measure. Physiotherapy Canada 1995;47:258– 63.

30. Dreisinger T, Novakova E, Clare H, et al. Clinical outcomes in the MDT setting: a cloud based International multicentre pilot. Vert Mooney Research Foundation, San Diego, California, unpublished data; prezentováno na McKenzie USA a Kanady konferenci, Miami, 2016.

31. McKenzie R, May S. The Cervical and Thoracic Spine-Mechanical Dia­gnosis and Therapy. 2nd ed. New Zealand: Spinal Publications 2006.

32. McKenzie R, May S. The Extremity-Mechanical Dia­g­nosis and Therapy. 1st ed. New Zealand: Spinal Publications 2002.

33. Nijs J, Apeldoorn A, Hal­legraeff H, et al. Low back pain: guidelines for the clinical clas­sification of predominant neuropathic, nociceptive, or central sensitization pain. Pain Physician 2015;18(3):E333– 46.

34. Fritz JM, Delitto A, Erhard RE, et al. Comparison of clas­sification-based physical therapy with therapy based on clinical practice guidelines for patients with acute low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. Spine 2003;28(13):1363– 71.

35. Smart KM, Blake C, Staines A, et al. Clinical indicators of ‘nociceptive’, ‘peripheral neuropathic’ and ‘central’ mechanisms of musculoskeletal pain. A Delphi survey of expert clinicians. Man Ther 2010;15(1):80– 7. doi: 10.1016/ j.math.2009.07.005.

36. Nicholas MK, Linton SJ, Watson PJ, et al. Early identification and management of psychological risk factors (“yel­low flags”) in patients with low back pain: a reappraisal. Physical Therapy 2011;91(5):737– 53. doi: 10.2522/ ptj.20100224.

37. Rubinstein S, Pool J, van Tulder M, et al. A systematic review of the dia­gnostic accuracy of provocative tests of the neck for dia­gnos­ing cervical radiculopathy. Eur Spine J 2007;16(3):307– 19.

38. Rubinstein S, Middelkoop M, As­sendelft W, et al. Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain. Spine 2011;36(13):E825– 46. doi: 10.1097/ BRS.0b013e3182197fe1.

39. Rubinstein SM, Terwee CB, As­sendelft WJ, et al. Spinal manipulative therapy for acute low-back pain; an update of the Cochrane review. Spine 2013;38(3):E158– 77. doi: 10.1097/ BRS.0b013e31827dd89d.

40. Koumantakis GA, Watson PJ, Oldham JA. Trunk muscle stabilization train­ing plus general exercise versus general exercise only: randomized control­led trial of patients with recur­rent low back pain. Phys Ther 2005;85(3):209– 25.

41. Rackwitz B, de Bie R, Limm H, et al. Segmental stabiliz­ing exercises and low back pain. What is the evidence? A systematic review of randomized control­led trials. Clin Reahbil 2006;20(7):553– 67.

42. Macedo LG, Latimer J, Maher CG, et al. Ef­fect of motor control exercises versus graded activity in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized control­led trial. Phys Ther 2012;92(3):363– 77. doi: 10.2522/ ptj.20110290.

43. Henry SM, Van Dil­len L, Oul­lette-Morton RH, et al. Outcomes are not dif­ferent for patient-matched versus nonmatched treatment in subjects with chronic recur­rent low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. Spine J 2014;14(12):2799– 810. doi: 10.1016/ j.spinee.2014.03.024.

44. O’Sul­livan P. It’s time for change with the management of non-specific chronic low back pain. Br J Sports Med 2012;46(4):224– 7. doi: 10.1136/ bjsm.2010.081638.

45. Smith EB, Littlewood C, May S. An update of stabilisation exercises for low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2014;15:416. doi: 10.1186/ 1471-2474-15-416.

Labels
Paediatric neurology Neurosurgery Neurology

Article was published in

Czech and Slovak Neurology and Neurosurgery

Issue 3

2017 Issue 3

Most read in this issue

This topic is also in:


Login
Forgotten password

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account